Controlling stimulus ambiguity reduces spurious creative ideation variance in a cyclic adaptation of the alternative uses task

0
  • Beaty, R., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J. & Schacter, D. L. Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 87–95 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, E. Creativity is optimal novelty and maximal positive affect: A new definition based on the spreading activation model. Front. Neurosci. 15, 612379 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, R. A., Weinberger, A. B., Daker, R. J. & Green, A. E. Re-examining prominent measures of divergent and convergent creativity. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 27, 90–93 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. Creativity, general creative abilities, and the creative individual. Bull. Counc. Res. Music Educ. 3, i–v (1964).

  • Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. The standard definition of creativity. Creat. Res. J. 24, 92–96 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Madore, K. P., Jing, H. G. & Schacter, D. L. Divergent creative thinking in young and older adults: Extending the effects of an episodic specificity induction. Mem. Cogn. 44, 974–988 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharkhurin, A. V. Creativity.4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creat. Res. J. 26, 338–352 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. Taking the U.S. Patent office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creat. Res. J. 24, 97–106 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B. & Smith, S. M. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, And Applications (MIT Press, 1996).

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. Creativity, personality and the convergent-divergent continuum. In Critical Creative Processes (ed. Eysenck, H. J.) 95–114 (Hampton Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. The nature of human intelligence (McGraw-Hill, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmiero, M., Nori, R., Piccardi, L. & D’Amico, S. Divergent thinking: The role of decision-making styles. Creat. Res. J. 32, 323–332 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabora, L. The neural basis and evolution of divergent and convergent thought. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (eds Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O.) 58–70 (Cambridge University Press, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556238.005.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon, S. A., Altmann, L. J. P., Abrams, L., Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. & Heilman, K. M. Divergent task performance in older adults: Declarative memory or creative potential?. Creat. Res. J. 26, 21–29 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A. & Mednick, M. T. Examiner’s Manual, remote Associates test : College and Adult Forms 1 and 2 (Houghton Mifflin Boston, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, E. M. & Jung-Beeman, M. Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 35, 634–639 (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-L., Huang, S.-Y., Chen, P.-Z. & Chen, H.-C. A systematic review of creativity-related studies applying the remote associates test from 2000 to 2019. Front. Psychol. 11, 573432 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alhashim, A. et al. Work in Progress: Assessing Creativity of Alternative Uses Task Responses: A Detailed Procedure. in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings 35612 (ASEE Conferences, 2020). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–35612.

  • Beaty, R. & Silvia, P. J. Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 6, 309–319 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M. et al. To create or to recall original ideas: Brain processes associated with the imagination of novel object uses. Cortex 99, 93–102 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H. & Wynn, V. Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. Br. J. Psychol. 98, 611–625 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass, R. W. & Beaty, R. Use or consequences: Probing the cognitive difference between two measures of divergent thinking. Front. Psychol. 9, 2327 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartanian, O. et al. The relationship between methods of scoring the alternate uses task and the neural correlates of divergent thinking: Evidence from voxel-based morphometry. NeuroImage 223, 117325 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, H., Leseman, P. P. M., Moerbeek, M., Kroesbergen, E. H. & Mulder, H. Serial order effect in divergent thinking in five- to six-year-olds: Individual differences as related to executive functions. J. Intell. 9, 20 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, C. & Badke-Schaub, P. The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. J. Creat. Behav. 45, 130–146 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • George, T. & Wiley, J. Need something different? Here’s what’s been done: Effects of examples and task instructions on creative idea generation. Mem. Cogn. 48, 226–243 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffran, E. M., Coslett, H. B. & Keener, M. T. Differences in word associations to pictures and words. Neuropsychologia 41, 1541–1546 (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrysikou, E. G., Motyka, K., Nigro, C., Yang, S.-I. & Thompson-Schill, S. L. Functional fixedness in creative thinking tasks depends on stimulus modality. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 10, 425–435 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • George, T., Mielicki, M. K. & Wiley, J. Great expectations: Misleading effects of images in the alternate uses task. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 17, 56–67 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M. & Neubauer, A. C. Revisiting Mednick’s model on creativity-related differences in associative hierarchies. Evidence for a common path to uncommon thought. J. Creat. Behav. 47, 273–289 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, R. & Johnson, D. R. Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance. Behav. Res. 53, 757–780 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbot, B. The dynamics of creative ideation: Introducing a new assessment paradigm. Front. Psychol. 9, 2529 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, R., Kenett, Y., Hass, R. W. & Schacter, D. L. 2019 A Fan Effect for Creative Thought: Semantic Richness Facilitates Idea Quantity but Constrains Idea Quality. 10.31234/osf.io/pfz2g.

  • Forthmann, B. et al. The be-creative effect in divergent thinking: The interplay of instruction and object frequency. Intelligence 57, 25–32 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, M. B., Guérard, K. & Bouras, M. Bank of standardized stimuli (BOSS) phase II: 930 new normative photos. PLoS One 9, e106953 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Krautz, A. E. & Keuleers, E. LinguaPix database: A megastudy of picture-naming norms. Behav. Res. 54, 941–954 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. JOSS 4, 1686 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (2021).

  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Soft. 67. (2015).

  • Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Soft. 82. (2017).

  • Lüdecke, D. sjPlot: Data Visualization for Statistics in Social Science. (2022).

  • Ben-Shachar, M., Lüdecke, D. & Makowski, D. effectsize: Estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. JOSS 5, 2815 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C. & Tily, H. J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 255–278 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S. & Baayen, H. Parsimonious Mixed Models. Preprint at (2018).

  • Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H. & Bates, D. Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. J. Mem. Lang. 94, 305–315 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, J. C. & Bates, D. M. Mixed-Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS (Springer, 2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1.

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 43, 997–1013 (1982).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 45, 357–376 (1983).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cseh, G. M. & Jeffries, K. K. A scattered CAT: A critical evaluation of the consensual assessment technique for creativity research. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 13, 159–166 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Lee, J., Baer, J. & Lee, S. Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique: New evidence of reliability. Think. Skills Creat. 2, 96–106 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Haught, C. The role of constraints in creative sentence production. Creat. Res. J. 27, 160–166 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tromp, C. Integrated constraints in creativity: Foundations for a unifying model. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 27, 41–61 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *